It Takes Three (Points)

Another game, another slim margin, another tired display. Only the most optimistic of Manchester United supporters would argue that the game against Aston Villa was a palatable display of brilliant football. Sloppy passing, fading forces and questionable decisions led to, at best, an unmemorable day. People have been complaining about the state of football that plagues the Red Devils. However, three points is still three points, and here’s why it’s not all doom and gloom – scrappy wins nevertheless have their purpose and place.

The most important thing is that we have six points from two games. That’s five more than we had this time last season, and that in itself is a marked improvement. Not necessarily in how United are playing, but in cold, hard-hearted statistical terms. Yes, football is a spectacle, and of course everybody wants to see their team play beautiful, flowing passes, and score mind-blowingly brilliant goals. But if flair and style were all that mattered then Arsenal would have long ended their title drought. More than anything football is a game of numbers – we see that proved to us every day with sites like Opta and Squawka, with punditry like Monday Night Football, breaking things down into percentages and niggly details. And points are that which matter in the quest for the title. I’m not saying that United fans should be happy with how the team played – far from it. What I’m saying is that no one has to be happy with how they played or how the game was won, but be happy that the game was in fact won in the first place. Playing beautifully and losing would have been far, far worse.

It’s not even that all hope is lost – although it was by no means a dazzling display, there were individual flashes of brilliance and the full backs were certainly players to watch. I feel like the reason people are getting so worked up over our lack of flair is because they’re comparing it to the image that United has built up for itself over the past twenty years, even though it might not necessarily ring true. As with all long runs of success, people begin to have particular memories of Sir Alex Ferguson’s era – the flashness of Ryan Giggs’s FA Cup semi-final goal, the gorgeous steamrollering of Ipswich (9-0) or even Arsenal (8-2). And it’s true – we did play a lot nicer in the old days. We were far more creative, dominant, all round magical to watch. But there are two things you have to remember in order to put these memories aside. The first is that, simply speaking, the calibre of players has changed. Not only do we not have Cantona in our side anymore, opponents such as Manchester City have added much firepower since they were last relegated in (as recently as) 2001. It’s simply not as easy to dominate in a much more evened out landscape, the acumen of signing players notwithstanding.

The second thing you have to remember is that Alex Ferguson’s sides were never flash first thing. Matt Busby, perhaps, concentrated on free-flowing, attacking football, but I feel that Ferguson’s sides concentrated on winning first, style second. It’s just that we were lucky to see so much style flourish during his time (and he never did anything to stymie it, for which we must also be grateful). People forget how scrappy the Bayern Munich-Manchester United final of 1999 actually was in favour of the last three minutes. Gone are the memories of the 95/96 title, which was won by a string of Cantona 1-0 wins. United has never been afraid to get scrappy when it’s necessary, and that is an important attribute of any title-winning side. It is the win that counts. It has always been the win that counts.

In fact, wins are even more important for this team because of how easily rattled their confidence is. We’ve seen this time and again; a winning streak will turn into a losing one because they cannot sustain a mentality that allows them to grind out results. The moment they lose, they collapse. This string of results is imperative, therefore, in restoring the shaken confidence (in large part introduced by Moyes). Manchester United need to get it into their heads that they can play badly and still win. The moment they restore that perpetual comeback mentality, then much of the road from here on out is eased. Perhaps the lack of confidence comes from the trophy drought (if two years can be considered a drought) – and, of course, it brings us back to the original method of winning trophies. Points.

Playing pretty will come in time. No one can or has the right to expect for our new signings to bed in easily, for a team that is almost completely overhauled to gel immediately. To play with a connection and flow you need to know and understand each other, and understanding comes with time. One of the reasons why Ferguson’s sides were so successful was because at the core of that team were players who’d known each other for years, and who throughout the 90s and early 00s proved that relationship on the pitch. Gary Neville always knew what David Beckham wanted. Paul Scholes would place balls within an inch of where Ryan Giggs was. You can’t expect players from what, four different leagues to have that fantastic a relationship from the start.

I’ve said before that big premier league teams always get stick for doing what mid-table teams are praised for: grinding out results. People should acknowledge that this is no mean feat, and it’s a hugely valuable asset that has time and time again been important in helping to win trophies. There is no shame in winning scrappily. There is a huge difference, however, between this and winning dirtily, and I think that’s what trips a lot of people up. Digging your heels in and not giving up is not something to be ashamed of. Playing ugly is different from playing dirty, and I consider it a true show of (as Brendan Rodgers would delightedly say) character and mental fortitude to do the former.

Yes, of course we need to improve. Yes, of course we need to guarantee wins. Yes, I miss our 3-0, 4-0, 5-0 games when we were simply in complete control. Who doesn’t? But there are so many factors and so much instability in the squad right now that we can’t possibly expect anything of the sort soon. We’ve got new players, we’ve got a new manager. The Fergie era is over and anyone who hopes for a return is only kidding themselves. I’m not saying that we shouldn’t be playing prettily, only that it shouldn’t be our number one priority. I’m not saying that some things really, really need to be relooked, only that we should not let this get us entirely down. I’d rather have six points from two games and questions to be answered than two points from six games and still questions to be answered. Hopefully one day this team will be playing beautiful football the Louis van Gaal way. But for now what is the most important is for Manchester United to set its sights on what it’s always been good at doing, whether gorgeous or ugly. Win.

Double Standards and Blind Eyes

Let’s take a (not-so) hypothetical situation. It’s a regular game of football. Player A has his leg out; Player B, whether intentionally or not, goes over Player A’s ankle like the freight train through the city in Inception. A red card is shown, a ban is slapped on, and Player B becomes the centre of the football world’s attention. Imagine you’re the embodiment of the press – you get to decide how everyone reacts to this. And there’re two possible scenarios. Scenario 1: vilify Player B as a monster, the bane of football, atrocious and vile and disgusting. Scenario 2: defend Player B passionately, blaming it on the heat of the moment and emotions, saying that actually he’s a really great guy.

You see where I’m going. Diego Costa and Steven Gerrard, both guilty of the exact same situation, but faced with a completely different reaction to their behaviour. Which is, to put it plainly and at the risk (sorry not sorry) of offending various Self-Righteous Liverpool Fans, quite ridiculous. There is nothing that should separate the actions of these two players, and yet one has been torn to shreds by the media, whereas the other has been put on a pedestal and given a sympathetic pat on the head. Clue: Gerrard isn’t the first one.

I can pinpoint a few reasons why the pinnacle of international media that is the English Press (note: sarcasm) insist on viewing things in this fashion, each of them as stupid as the next. The first and most obvious is the herd mentality that most fans subscribe to at the moment: Diego Costa is the man everyone loves to hate. It’s become almost fashionable, if you’re not a Chelsea fan, to mock his face and deride his football, no matter what the state of it actually is. I’m not saying that his actions are excusable or indeed welcome – quite the opposite – but what I am saying is that people are calling him a monster not just because of what he did, but because of who he is.

Don’t believe me? Look at the reception Gerrard got. I spent a good ten minutes listen to Jamie Carragher spouting post-match mindless, drivel about how Gerrard’s red card was down to his being ‘emotional’ and ‘frustrated’, talking about how he’s ‘always been the captain’, and how it was somehow Rodgers’s fault for not playing him. Hm. United fans will tell you the tragedy of Juan Mata and Ander Herrera being left on the bench for large parts of the period, but when either of them gets to start they tend to score goals and log assists rather than spend less time on the pitch than a Minute to Win It game. And Gerrard’s captaincy should incriminate him more, not less, because he should be experienced enough to handle his emotions in a way that is not manifested by stamping on other players’ ankles. Not only Carragher, but much of the press was quick to lay the blame on a ‘moment of madness’. The double standard is quite frankly alarming.

I suppose it boils down to the massive gulf that separates these two players. Costa makes himself easy to hate, whereas Gerrard is a Liverpool legend and, tellingly, an English player. It’s a lot more comfortable to call out someone who’s already got a bad reputation in the press – far less so to call out someone who is highly regarded in general. I remember during England’s World Cup campaign hardly anyone was laying the blame on Gerrard for his beautiful assist for Luis Suarez, or at least not on the level of the stick that Wayne Rooney gets game after national game, even though Rooney doesn’t deserve 80% of it. It’s the same thing – it’s easy to hate Rooney, and the press tend to take the easy option most of the time.

The blinkers are intensified by the fact that Costa wasn’t punished for his stamp in terms of red cards, whereas Gerrard’s 46 second cameo inspired both hilarity and (misguided) sympathy. There will always be hate for a player who didn’t get the punishment he deserved, even though Costa did get the same 3 game ban afterwards. Meanwhile the context of Gerrard’s game and situation – the last ever Northwest Derby he will play in, the last time he’ll lead Liverpool out against Manchester United, the ‘tragic’ circumstances of his leaving – are all hyped up and massively overinflated. Gerrard himself hasn’t helped, playing up the victim part and courting pity. Rodgers said he was ‘man enough’ to apologise for the stamp, but listen to it again and you’ll realise he was only apologising to Liverpool fans for getting sent off. Not apologising for his actions, not apologising to Herrera. That’s not particularly ‘big’. (Another comparison if you are keen – when Rooney apologised for his ‘dive’ against Cambridge the press was on him like Mark Clattenburg on an Ed Sheeran concert. When Gerrard apologised for this, it’s the greatest thing since sliced bread.) This playing up of the ‘Gerrard is sorry and he really can’t be blamed’ stick is hypocritical at best.

There is absolutely no reason why one man should be treated as a criminal and the other as ‘playing with his heart’. It doesn’t matter whether you think stamping is wrong or not – if you think that Gerrard shouldn’t be punished or isn’t to blame, then you must think that Costa shouldn’t have been punished and wasn’t to blame either. Vice versa. There is no moral high ground for Liverpool fans to assume because it  fundamentally boils down to the same thing (and don’t even get me started on Skrtel). Give discredit where discredit is due. Legends are not fallible and should not be treated as such. Of course it’s fine to love a player to the ends of the world and back, especially if he’s your one-club Captain and always has been. But loving him does not mean turning a blind eye to the mistakes that he makes, or worse, trying to defend him using the most inane reasoning (hi Jamie). If one of my favourite United players had done the same thing, I’d have been gutted, but would have to call him out on it.

The only thing different between Gerrard and Costa is that one’s considered a legend and the other a bad boy. But there’s no room for history and backstory on the pitch, and status should not overcome wrongdoing. Sure, it’s probably upsetting for Gerrard to leave Liverpool on such a sour note, but tough luck – it’s his fault and he shouldn’t get any sympathy, at least not in terms of his actions. There are so many things wrong with the fans and the press and this is just one of them, but we could really, really do with a lot less double standard and blind eyes. If you’re just here for the Gerrard jokes, though, then I offer a rendering of Taylor Swift’s Shake It Off:

‘Cause the players gonna play, play, play, play, play
Stevie G is going cray, cray, cray, cray, cray
What the Scouers gonna say, say, say, say, say
Slippin’ up, slippin’ up

Forty seconds on the clock, clock, clock, clock, clock
Makes it so easy to mock, mock, mock, mock, mock
Hope he had a real good walk, walk, walk, walk, walk
Slippin’ up, slippin’ up